QUOTE(The Goat @ Oct 29 2008, 01:14 PM)

I was swimming.
according to your information your 22. so whe you say you were "swimming" in 86 i'm assuming you mean swimming in your daddy's ball bag...lol
QUOTE(The Goat @ Oct 29 2008, 01:14 PM)

Now, black sheep aka mr. Atc, if you wouldn't have been banned from the other forum for such a poor attitude, you would have seen that a member recently dynoed a crate engine at 22 hp and with a little nos blowing, the bike touched 28.
when people resort to off topic remarks/attacks on ones person it is usually because that party making the attack is losing the debate and therefore trying to devert the direction of the debate in order to misdirect the debate from there losing argument. Additionally I left that site because that site is more of a FEEL GOOD site filled with half truth information. I do not remember you asa member so i don't think you have any RELIABLE information to base your opinion on.
QUOTE(The Goat @ Oct 29 2008, 01:14 PM)

As for radar guns, until laser tech made it's way into the field, those guns had over an 8mph margin of error. I've been working with the sheriffs office the last 7 years. Even the new radar guns get twitchy from time to time.
It's ironic how law enforcement officers for years testified under oath to the accuracy of Radar guns. They have been doing this for dozens of years. Now all of a sudden someone in law enforcement says that NO they are not accurate. Therfore stating by opinion that all other officers before lied under oath.
Furthermore are you stating that a radar gun test done in california by the most respected ATV magazine was inacurate AND has the exact same inacuracy as a radar gun in a police car on the east coast which verified the other result???
QUOTE(The Goat @ Oct 29 2008, 01:14 PM)

I merely came here to buy parts, you can be that three wheeler guy.
that very well maybe but, you decided to post on another subject so here we are!!!
QUOTE(The Goat @ Oct 29 2008, 01:14 PM)

I'll grant that you're are likely correct concerning the 300ex rear, as I've only heard they fit, I've seen dynos. And no stock 350x is banging down 27 at the wheels. What I don't understand, is that even Honda rated these bikes at 27 at the crank.... And you're saying no, the bike really did it... How sad
What i don't understand is were did i once mentioned HP at either the crank or wheel. I mearlly stated CORRECTLY that according to Honda/NY DMV/TiTle the 350x has 27 hp and the 400ex has 27.5 hp stock. AND that any Dyno done 20 yrs after the fact is irrelevnt.
Finally i think people can make up there own minds as who to believe, someone with over 20rs experiance with the very bike in question OR someone barly over 20 yrs old going off of his own research.
BTW...were did your name "The Goat" come from...